 
          © Benaki Phytopathological Institute
        
        
          Kioulos & Koliopoulos
        
        
          24
        
        
          tion but it increased significantly during the
        
        
          following days (88% and 83%, 6 and 15 days
        
        
          after Aquatain
        
        
          TM
        
        
          application, respectively)
        
        
          and was significantly higher than mortality
        
        
          in line 3. Larval mortality in line 3 increased
        
        
          and reached its highest level (42%) six days
        
        
          after application.
        
        
          Increase of larval mortality over time in
        
        
          lines 2 and 3 can be attributed to the time
        
        
          needed for the spread of the product. Fur-
        
        
          thermore, three days after the application of
        
        
          Aquatain
        
        
          TM
        
        
          (first assessment) all cages in the
        
        
          paddy were found above the water surface
        
        
          as the amount of irrigation water could not
        
        
          maintain the water level. Thus, there was ad-
        
        
          equate water in the traps to keep mosquito
        
        
          larvae alive but Aquatain
        
        
          TM
        
        
          could not enter
        
        
          into the cages except for those in line 1. Ad-
        
        
          justment of the supporting poles after the
        
        
          first assessment, allowing the water to cov-
        
        
          er half of the cage opening, is also associat-
        
        
          ed with time period of the mortality levels
        
        
          increase in lines 2 and 3.
        
        
          The complete coverage of the experi-
        
        
          mental paddy occurred at slower mode than
        
        
          that reported in other studies (Bukhari
        
        
          et al.,
        
        
          2011). This could possibly be due to high-
        
        
          er density of the rice plants as in our case
        
        
          Aquatain
        
        
          TM
        
        
          was applied relatively late in the
        
        
          season, after tillering had been completed.
        
        
          Aquatain
        
        
          TM
        
        
          remained highly effective in
        
        
          lines1 and 2 for at least 15 days (larval mor-
        
        
          tality rates ranged up to 95% and 83%, re-
        
        
          spectively). Environmental factors (rainfall,
        
        
          strong winds) as well as cultivation tech-
        
        
          niques may possibly influence the efficacy
        
        
          of Aquatain
        
        
          TM
        
        
          over extensive and verdant
        
        
          mosquito breeding sites. For this reason
        
        
          Bukhari
        
        
          et al.
        
        
          (2011) recommended a reap-
        
        
          plication of 10 – 14 days in rice paddies in
        
        
          Kenya in order to effectively control mosqui-
        
        
          to larvae. However, in container mosquito
        
        
          habitats Aquatain
        
        
          TM
        
        
          provided effective con-
        
        
          trol of mosquito larvae for at least 4 weeks
        
        
          at the labelled dose-rate (1ml/m
        
        
          2
        
        
          ) and thus
        
        
          the recommended reapplication frequency
        
        
          is every 4 weeks even though a longer larval
        
        
          control may be achieved with a single appli-
        
        
          cation (Webb and Russell, 2012).
        
        
          In conclusion, our study showed that
        
        
          Aquatain
        
        
          TM
        
        
          is an effective control agent
        
        
          against mosquitoes not only in small or
        
        
          closed water ecosystems (Webb and Rus-
        
        
          sell, 2012), but also in extensive water sur-
        
        
          faces such as rice paddies. It causes death of
        
        
          the existing mosquito larvae and pupae of a
        
        
          breeding site (Webb and Russell, 2009) and
        
        
          it can offer sufficient protection from the de-
        
        
          velopment of newmosquito generations for
        
        
          at least 3 weeks.
        
        
          
            Table 1.
          
        
        
          Mean larval mortality (±SE) and percentage mortality (%) of L
        
        
          4
        
        
          mosquito larvae of
        
        
          Culex pipiens
        
        
          in cages over a period of 25 days after application of the product Aquatain
        
        
          TM
        
        
          in
        
        
          a rice paddy in the Prefecture of Phthiotida, Greece.
        
        
          Experimental paddy
        
        
          Control paddy*
        
        
          Days after
        
        
          application of
        
        
          Aquatain
        
        
          TM
        
        
          line 1
        
        
          line 2
        
        
          line 3
        
        
          lines 1,2,3
        
        
          (pooled data)
        
        
          3
        
        
          20.0 ± 0.0
        
        
          5.67 ± 5.13
        
        
          0.0 ± 0.0
        
        
          1.0 ± 1.0
        
        
          (100%) a§
        
        
          (28%) b
        
        
          (0%) b
        
        
          (1.67%) b
        
        
          6
        
        
          20.0 ± 0.0
        
        
          17.67 ± 3.21
        
        
          8.33 ± 2.08
        
        
          1.33 ± 0.56
        
        
          (100%) a
        
        
          (88.3%) a
        
        
          (41.7%) b
        
        
          (2.22%) c
        
        
          15
        
        
          19.0 ± 1.0
        
        
          16.67 ± 0.58
        
        
          5.33 ± 2.08
        
        
          0.33 ± 0.57
        
        
          (95%) a
        
        
          (83.3%) b
        
        
          (26.7%) c
        
        
          (0.56%) d
        
        
          25
        
        
          14.0 ± 1.0
        
        
          5.0 ± 1.0
        
        
          2.0 ± 1.0
        
        
          1.33 ± 1.15
        
        
          (70%) a
        
        
          (25%) b
        
        
          (10%) c
        
        
          (2.21%) c
        
        
          * Without application of Aquatain
        
        
          TM
        
        
          § Different letters within rows indicate statistically significant differences.